Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Brian E. Simmons, 14-11087 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-11087 Visitors: 134
Filed: Dec. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11087 Date Filed: 12/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11087 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00120-VMC-TGW-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRIAN E. SIMMONS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 31, 2014) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Grady C. Irvin, Jr., a
More
              Case: 14-11087    Date Filed: 12/31/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]



               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 14-11087
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00120-VMC-TGW-2



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

BRIAN E. SIMMONS,

                                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                         ________________________

                               (December 31, 2014)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Grady C. Irvin, Jr., appointed counsel for Brian E. Simmons in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
              Case: 14-11087     Date Filed: 12/31/2014   Page: 2 of 2


appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Simmons’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer