Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jose Antonio Cox-Cuellar, 14-11245 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-11245 Visitors: 78
Filed: Oct. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11245 Date Filed: 10/28/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11245 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20827-UU-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ANTONIO COX-CUELLAR, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 28, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11245 Date
More
           Case: 14-11245   Date Filed: 10/28/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 14-11245
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20827-UU-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,


                                  versus


JOSE ANTONIO COX-CUELLAR,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Florida
                      ________________________

                            (October 28, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-11245    Date Filed: 10/28/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Alfredo Izaguirre, counsel for Jose Cox-Cuellar in this appeal, has moved to

withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant

to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Cox-Cuellar’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer