Filed: Feb. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-15304 Date Filed: 02/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15304 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00250-IPJ-TMP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAIME MARTINEZ-PONCE, a.k.a. Jamie Ponce-Martinez, a.k.a. Jaime Ponce-Martinez a.k.a. Ancelmo Martinez-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (February 17, 201
Summary: Case: 13-15304 Date Filed: 02/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15304 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00250-IPJ-TMP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAIME MARTINEZ-PONCE, a.k.a. Jamie Ponce-Martinez, a.k.a. Jaime Ponce-Martinez a.k.a. Ancelmo Martinez-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (February 17, 2015..
More
Case: 13-15304 Date Filed: 02/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-15304
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00250-IPJ-TMP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAIME MARTINEZ-PONCE,
a.k.a. Jamie Ponce-Martinez,
a.k.a. Jaime Ponce-Martinez
a.k.a. Ancelmo Martinez-Martinez,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(February 17, 2015)
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JULIE CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-15304 Date Filed: 02/17/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Richard Aaron Chastain and John Sims Rhyne, appointed counsel for Jaime
Martinez-Ponce in this direct criminal appeal, have moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsels’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Martinez-Ponce=s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2