Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Omar L. Garcia, 14-13853 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-13853 Visitors: 39
Filed: Apr. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-13853 Date Filed: 04/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13853 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80169-KLR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OMAR L. GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (April 16, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-13853 Date Filed: 04/16/
More
           Case: 14-13853   Date Filed: 04/16/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                     [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-13853
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80169-KLR-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,


                                  versus


OMAR L. GARCIA,
                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (April 16, 2015)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
                 Case: 14-13853       Date Filed: 04/16/2015        Page: 2 of 2


       Thomas Butler, counsel for Omar Garcia in this direct criminal appeal, has

moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination

of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, * counsel’s motion to

withdraw is GRANTED, and Garcia’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.




*
 Given the state of the record, we cannot decide issues of ineffective assistance of counsel or of
prosecutorial misconduct in this appeal.
                                                 2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer