Filed: Sep. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-10368 Date Filed: 09/18/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10368 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cr-00144-SPC-CM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS RODRIGO HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Miguel Angel Leyva-Romero, a.k.a. Carlos Rodrigo-Hernandez, a.k.a. Carlos Hernandez-Rodrigo, a.k.a. Miguel Angel Leiva-Romero, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Mi
Summary: Case: 15-10368 Date Filed: 09/18/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10368 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cr-00144-SPC-CM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS RODRIGO HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Miguel Angel Leyva-Romero, a.k.a. Carlos Rodrigo-Hernandez, a.k.a. Carlos Hernandez-Rodrigo, a.k.a. Miguel Angel Leiva-Romero, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Mid..
More
Case: 15-10368 Date Filed: 09/18/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-10368
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cr-00144-SPC-CM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARLOS RODRIGO HERNANDEZ,
a.k.a. Miguel Angel Leyva-Romero,
a.k.a. Carlos Rodrigo-Hernandez,
a.k.a. Carlos Hernandez-Rodrigo,
a.k.a. Miguel Angel Leiva-Romero,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 18, 2015)
Before JORDAN, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-10368 Date Filed: 09/18/2015 Page: 2 of 2
The Office of the Federal Defender, appointed counsel in this direct criminal
appeal for Carlos Rodrigo Hernandez, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of Hernandez and has filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Hernandez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2