Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hooker v. Hoey, 71 (1939)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 71 Visitors: 8
Judges: Swan, Chase, and Clark, Circuit Judges
Filed: Nov. 20, 1939
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: 107 F.2d 1016 (1939) George W. HOOKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James J. HOEY, Collector of the United States Internal Revenue for the Second District of the State of New York, Defendant-Appellee. No. 71. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. November 20, 1939. Holt S. McKinney, of New York City, for appellant. John T. Cahill, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Dolores C. Faconti, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellee. Before SWAN, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CU
More
107 F.2d 1016 (1939)

George W. HOOKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James J. HOEY, Collector of the United States Internal Revenue for the Second District of the State of New York, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 71.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 20, 1939.

Holt S. McKinney, of New York City, for appellant.

John T. Cahill, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Dolores C. Faconti, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed on opinion below, D. C., 27 F. Supp. 489.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer