Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

2 Fair empl.prac.cas. 271, 2 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,136 Dominick Saffioti v. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York, 33764_1 (1969)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 33764_1 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 04, 1969
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 417 F.2d 971 2 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 271 , 2 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,136 Dominick SAFFIOTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Martin P. CATHERWOOD, as Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York, Defendant-Appellee. No. 222, Docket 33764. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. Argued Nov. 4, 1969. Decided Nov. 4, 1969. Dominick Saffioti, Newburgh, N.Y., appellant, pro se. Robert S. Hammer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of Ne
More

417 F.2d 971

2 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 271, 2 Empl. Prac. Dec.
P 10,136
Dominick SAFFIOTI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Martin P. CATHERWOOD, as Industrial Commissioner of the
State of New York, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 222, Docket 33764.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 4, 1969.
Decided Nov. 4, 1969.

Dominick Saffioti, Newburgh, N.Y., appellant, pro se.

Robert S. Hammer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, for defendant-appellee.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks money damages for alleged violations of his constitutional rights, 42 U.S.C. 1983, 1985. He maintains that these rights were in some way denied to him in connection with certain administrative proceedings conducted by the Division of Employment Security of the New York State Department of Labor. In accord with the holding of the trial judge below, Judge Bonsal of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 305 F. Supp. 989, we find that appellant received due process in compliance with the requirements of state law, and that there is no merit to his claims that he has suffered the loss of any federal constitutional protection.

2

We affirm the judgment below on the opinion of Judge Bonsal.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer