SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Go Green Realty Corp., GCP West Realty Corp., GCP East Realty Corp., GCP 188th Realty Corp., MD South Realty Corp., and MD North Realty Corp. (together, "Go Green") appeal from the March 30, 2015 memorandum and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Freeman, C.M.J.) granting summary judgment to defendants on Go Green's claims that, inter alia, defendants breached certain contractual agreements by setting motor fuel prices in bad faith in violation of U.C.C. § 2-305(2) and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and specification of issues for review.

Go Green argues that the district court ignored probative evidence in the record and misapplied the law in granting the motion for summary judgment dismissing Go Green's claims. We disagree. As the district court carefully explained, Go Green failed to meet its burden of production and thus did not raise a question of material fact as to improper motive, discriminatory pricing, or commercial reasonableness. We thus affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion.

We have considered the remainder of Go Green's arguments and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the order of the district court hereby is AFFIRMED.