Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

89-2797 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 89-2797 Visitors: 28
Filed: May 21, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 905 F.2d 1530 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Frank LEVINER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BENSON PUBLISHING COMPANY; William J. Gaither; Gary McSpadden, Defendants-Appellees, and the CATHEDRAL QUARTET, a professional association; David Huntsinger; Brent Ro
More

905 F.2d 1530
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frank LEVINER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BENSON PUBLISHING COMPANY; William J. Gaither; Gary
McSpadden, Defendants-Appellees,
and
the CATHEDRAL QUARTET, a professional association; David
Huntsinger; Brent Rowan; Mike Bricnardello;
Eddie Bayers; Farrell Norris; Bruce
Watkins; John Slick, Defendants,
v.
ACUFF-ROSE MUSIC, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-2797.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 1990.
Decided May 21, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, District Judge. (C/A No. 88-3398-4-2)

Frank Leviner, appellant pro se.

Saunders McKenzie Bridges, Bridges & Orr, Brown N. Johnson, Florence, S.C., Joseph Michael Killeen, Rogers & Killeen, Alexandria, Va., for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Frank Leviner appeals from the district court's order which granted summary judgment to defendants in his action for copyright infringement of a song. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Leviner v. Benson Publishing Co., C/A No. 88-3398-4-2 (D.S.C. Sept. 8, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer