Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jahic v. Atty Gen USA, 04-3726 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 04-3726 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 09, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-9-2006 Jahic v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-3726 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "Jahic v. Atty Gen USA" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1611. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1611 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of
More
Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-9-2006 Jahic v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-3726 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "Jahic v. Atty Gen USA" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1611. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1611 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT January 30, 2006 No. 04–3726 Sead Jahic; Selma Jahic; Amar Jahic, Petitioners vs. Attorney General of the United States (A71-873-466, 67 & 68) PRESENT: ROTH, RENDELL and BARRY, Circuit Judges. Motion by Respondent to vacate the decision and dismiss the Petition for Review for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. /s/ Carolyn Hicks Answer due 2/13/06 Carolyn Hicks 267-299-4926 Case Manager ORDER The foregoing motion is GRANTED. Because petitioners are no longer subject to a final order of deportation, this Court’s decision of August 2, 2005 is vacated and the petition dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. By the Court, /s/ Maryanne Trump Barry Circuit Judge Dated: February 9, 2006 CH/cc: JBS, AMI, WCP, TJS, LSW, ERB
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer