Filed: Nov. 23, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 07-9005 _ JAMES LAMBERT, Appellant v. JEFFREY BEARD, COMMISSIONER, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIAM STRICKMAN, III, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GREENE; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA _ APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. Civil No. 02-cv-09034) District Judge: Honorable
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 07-9005 _ JAMES LAMBERT, Appellant v. JEFFREY BEARD, COMMISSIONER, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIAM STRICKMAN, III, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GREENE; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA _ APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. Civil No. 02-cv-09034) District Judge: Honorable M..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
____________
No. 07-9005
____________
JAMES LAMBERT,
Appellant
v.
JEFFREY BEARD, COMMISSIONER, PENNSYLVANIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIAM STRICKMAN, III,
SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
AT GREENE; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF
PHILADELPHIA; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
____________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
(D.C. Civil No. 02-cv-09034)
District Judge: Honorable Michael M. Baylson
____________
ORDER
____________
Appellant James Lambert has been under sentence of death since 1984, during
which time the case has wended its way through the state and federal courts. On
September 30, 2010, this Court heard argument on Lambert’s appeal from the District
Court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, an appeal
that challenges the District Court’s disposition of the various contentions Lambert raised
as to both his conviction for first degree murder and the sentence of death imposed
thereon.
Unless there is a prior disposition of this case, an Opinion of this Court will issue
in due course addressing the contentions raised to the conviction itself and whether the
judgment of the District Court as to the conviction should be affirmed. This Court,
however, having concluded that, whether reviewed de novo or under AEDPA’s
deferential standard of review, the District Court erred in finding that there had not been
a violation of the rule of Mills v. Maryland,
486 U.S. 367 (1988).
IT is, therefore, on this 23rd day of November 2010
ORDERED that the sentence of death be and hereby is VACATED and, pending
further order of this Court, any conditions and/or disabilities to which petitioner is being
subjected because of the sentence of death, including but not limited to, being housed
other than in the general population, be lifted.
/s/ Maryanne Trump Barry
Circuit Judge A True Copy :
Marcia M . Waldron, Clerk
Dated: November 23, 2010
nmr/cc: Thomas W. Dolgenos, Esq.
Joshua S. Goldwert, Esq.
Stuart B. Lev, Esq.
Daniel Silverman, Esq.
2