Mukash Kumar Patel v. Atty Gen USA, 10-1554 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Number: 10-1554
Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 25, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT March 16, 2011 No. 10-1554 MUKASH KUMA MANEKLAL PATEL, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent (BIA-1: A074-586-999 ) Present: BARRY, HARDIMAN and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges Motion filed by Respondent Atty Gen USA to publish the opinion filed on 02/24/11. Respectfully, Clerk/trg _ORDER_ The foregoing Motion is GRANTED. The designation of the opinion in this matter as precedential does not alter the Court’s pre
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT March 16, 2011 No. 10-1554 MUKASH KUMA MANEKLAL PATEL, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent (BIA-1: A074-586-999 ) Present: BARRY, HARDIMAN and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges Motion filed by Respondent Atty Gen USA to publish the opinion filed on 02/24/11. Respectfully, Clerk/trg _ORDER_ The foregoing Motion is GRANTED. The designation of the opinion in this matter as precedential does not alter the Court’s prev..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT March 16, 2011 No. 10-1554 MUKASH KUMA MANEKLAL PATEL, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent (BIA-1: A074-586-999 ) Present: BARRY, HARDIMAN and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges Motion filed by Respondent Atty Gen USA to publish the opinion filed on 02/24/11. Respectfully, Clerk/trg _________________________________ORDER________________________________ The foregoing Motion is GRANTED. The designation of the opinion in this matter as precedential does not alter the Court’s previously issued judgment. As such the filing date of the judgment and the decision remain unchanged. By the Court, /s/ Thomas M. Hardiman Circuit Judge Dated: April 25, 2011 CJG/cc: Matthew B. George, Esq. Dawn S. Conrad, Esq. Harold D. Block, Esq.
Source: CourtListener
