Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Steverson v. Clark, 4112 (1936)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 4112 Visitors: 15
Judges: Parker and Soper, Circuit Judges, and Chesnut, District Judge
Filed: Nov. 17, 1936
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2020
Summary: 86 F.2d 330 (1936) STEVERSON v. CLARK et al. [*] No. 4112. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. November 17, 1936. S. P. Knotts, Jr., of Columbia, S. C., for appellant. M. E. Zeigler, of Orangeburg, S. C., for appellees. Before PARKER and SOPER, Circuit Judges, and CHESNUT, District Judge. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from an order refusing to adjudicate appellant a bankrupt under subsection (s) of section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended by the second Frazier-Lemke Act (Act Aug. 28, 1
More
86 F.2d 330 (1936)

STEVERSON
v.
CLARK et al.[*]

No. 4112.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

November 17, 1936.

S. P. Knotts, Jr., of Columbia, S. C., for appellant.

M. E. Zeigler, of Orangeburg, S. C., for appellees.

Before PARKER and SOPER, Circuit Judges, and CHESNUT, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to adjudicate appellant a bankrupt under subsection (s) of section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended by the second Frazier-Lemke Act (Act Aug. 28, 1935, § 6 [11 U.S.C.A. § 203 (s). The judge below approved findings by the Conciliation Commissioner to the effect that an offer of composition and extension had not been made in good faith by the bankrupt; and he accordingly refused an adjudication of bankruptcy and dismissed the proceedings on that ground. For that reason, he found it unnecessary to pass upon the constitutional validity of the second Frazier-Lemke Act, although this was duly challenged in appellees' motion to dismiss. We find nothing in the record which would justify us in disturbing the order of the District judge approving the findings of the Conciliation Commissioner, and we agree that these afford sufficient ground for denying the adjudication and dismissing the proceedings. In re Borgelt (C.C.A.7th) 79 F.(2d) 929. In addition to this, we have recently held that the second Frazier-Lemke Act is void because violative of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Robert Page Wright, Bankrupt, v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank and five other cases (C.C.A. 4th) 85 F.(2d) 973. In any aspect of the case, therefore, the judge below properly denied the adjudication and dismissed the petition. The order appealed from will accordingly be affirmed.

Affirmed.

NOTES

[*] Writ of certiorari denied 57 S. Ct. 508, 81 L. Ed. ___.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer