Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Samuel McQueen v. David O'Dea Attorney General of North Carolina, 87-7356 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-7356 Visitors: 26
Filed: Aug. 03, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 857 F.2d 1469 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Samuel McQUEEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David O'DEA; Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 87-7356. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: July 8, 1988. Decide
More

857 F.2d 1469
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Samuel McQUEEN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David O'DEA; Attorney General of North Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 87-7356.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 8, 1988.
Decided: Aug. 3, 1988.

Samuel McQueen, appellant pro se.

Barry Steven McNeill (Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina), for appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Samuel McQueen seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McQueen v. O'Dea, CA-86-836-AM (M.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer