Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dexter D. Coffin, III v. Edward W. Murray, Attorney General of the State of Virginia, 89-7007 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7007 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 08, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 875 F.2d 314 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dexter D. COFFIN, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY, Attorney General of the State of Virginia, Respondents-Appellees. No. 89-7007. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Mar
More

875 F.2d 314
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dexter D. COFFIN, III, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Attorney General of the State of Virginia,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-7007.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 31, 1989.
Decided May 8, 1989.

Dexter D. Coffin, III, appellant pro se.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Dexter D. Coffin, III, seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Coffin v. Murray, C/A No. 87-54-C-M (W.D.Va. Dec. 7, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer