Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ellis Harley Barber, Rev. v. Robert C. Novak, Lieutenant, 90-3065 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-3065 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 19, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 922 F.2d 835 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ellis Harley BARBER, Rev., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert C. NOVAK, Lieutenant, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-3065. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 28, 1990. Decided Dec. 19, 19
More

922 F.2d 835

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ellis Harley BARBER, Rev., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert C. NOVAK, Lieutenant, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-3065.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 28, 1990.
Decided Dec. 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-87-2677-N)

Ellis Harley Barber, appellant pro se.

Robert Charles Verderaime, Verderaime and Dubois, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Ellis Harley Barber appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barber v. Novak, CA-87-2677-N (D.Md. Mar. 22, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer