Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Theodore Lewis Williams, Jr. v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, 90-7050 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-7050 Visitors: 35
Filed: Jul. 20, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 911 F.2d 726 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Theodore Lewis WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-7050. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitt
More

911 F.2d 726
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Theodore Lewis WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Virginia Department of
Corrections, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-7050.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 89-826-N)

Theodore Lewis Williams, Jr., appellant pro se.

Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Theodore Lewis Williams, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Murray, CA-89-826-N (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer