Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Charles L. Reynard, Jr. v. Montgomery County Jail Lieutenant Keys, 92-6249 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6249 Visitors: 39
Filed: Oct. 21, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 977 F.2d 573 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Charles L. REYNARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL; Lieutenant Keys, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-6249. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: September 25, 1992 Decided: October 21, 1992 A
More

977 F.2d 573

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles L. REYNARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL; Lieutenant Keys, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6249.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 25, 1992
Decided: October 21, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

Charles L. Reynard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Carole Marie Agee, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Charles L. Reynard, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Reynard v. Montgomery County Jail, No. CA-91-280-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 6, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Appellees' motion to dismiss based on an untimely filed notice of appeal is denied

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer