Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

92-6901 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-6901 Visitors: 22
Filed: Dec. 17, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 981 F.2d 1251 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jabir Na'im PASHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas R. CORCORAN, Warden; Phillip Thomas, Facility Administrator, Defendants-Appellees, and D. Walton, Correctional Officer II; James H. Ashby; Diane Scurry; Unknown Persons, Baltimore
More

981 F.2d 1251

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jabir Na'im PASHA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas R. CORCORAN, Warden; Phillip Thomas, Facility
Administrator, Defendants-Appellees,
and
D. Walton, Correctional Officer II; James H. Ashby; Diane
Scurry; Unknown Persons, Baltimore PreRelease
Unit, Defendants.

No. 92-6901.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 1992
Decided: December 17, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Jabir Na'im Pasha, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Jabir Na'im Pasha appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pasha v. Corcoran, No. CA-92-436-WN (D. Md. Aug. 14, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer