Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In Re: Robert L. Sauers, Jr., 92-8061 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-8061 Visitors: 34
Filed: Jan. 19, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 983 F.2d 1057 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. In Re: Robert L. SAUERS, Jr., Petitioner. No. 92-8061. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: November 11, 1992 Decided: January 19, 1993 On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Petition denied by unpublished per cu
More

983 F.2d 1057

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In Re: Robert L. SAUERS, Jr., Petitioner.

No. 92-8061.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 11, 1992
Decided: January 19, 1993

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Sauers, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

1

Petition Denied.

2

Before WILLIAMS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

3

Robert L. Sauers, Jr., filed this petition for writ of mandamus seeking a court order requiring certain individuals to produce specific documents concerning an allegedly false urinalysis test. Mandamus relief cannot be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Furthermore, mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). To the extent that Sauers challenges the execution of his sentence, his claims may be addressed in a petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988). Further, claims regarding the deprivation of constitutional rights may be addressed in a Bivens* action. Therefore, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions are adequately presented and arguments will not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

*

Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer