Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

James F. Dukes, Jr. v. John Carter, Correctional Officer William Outman, Correctional Officer, 93-6425 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6425 Visitors: 43
Filed: Jul. 14, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 998 F.2d 1008 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. James F. DUKES, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John CARTER, Correctional Officer; William Outman, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-6425. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: June 23, 1993. De
More

998 F.2d 1008

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James F. DUKES, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John CARTER, Correctional Officer; William Outman,
Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-6425.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 23, 1993.
Decided: July 14, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-92-329-CRT-BO)

James F. Dukes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

James F. Dukes, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dukes v. Carter, No. CA-92-329-CRT-BO (E.D.N.C., Mar. 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer