Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lionel L. Rogers v. Stewart Kitchen, Sheriff Mack Knowles, Lieutenant John Zimmerman, Sergeant Dwight Gay, 94-6537 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 94-6537 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 25, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 30 F.3d 130 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lionel L. ROGERS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Stewart KITCHEN, Sheriff; Mack Knowles, Lieutenant; John Zimmerman, Sergeant; Dwight Gay, Defendants Appellees. No. 94-6537. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 2
More

30 F.3d 130

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lionel L. ROGERS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Stewart KITCHEN, Sheriff; Mack Knowles, Lieutenant; John
Zimmerman, Sergeant; Dwight Gay, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6537.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 28, 1994.
Decided July 25, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-93-1480-AM)

Lionel L. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.

Archer Lafayette Yeatts, III, Maloney, Yeatts & Barr, P.C., Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rogers v. Kitchen, No. CA-93-1480-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 10, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer