Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-6020 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6020 Visitors: 31
Filed: Apr. 06, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 51 F.3d 265 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. R.J. COMBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William H. FREEMAN; James G. Exum, Judge, North Carolina Supreme Court Justice; North Carolina Court of Appeals; North Carolina Supreme Court, Defendants-Appellees. R.J. COMBS, Plaintiff-Appellan
More

51 F.3d 265

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
R.J. COMBS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William H. FREEMAN; James G. Exum, Judge, North Carolina
Supreme Court Justice; North Carolina Court of
Appeals; North Carolina Supreme Court,
Defendants-Appellees.
R.J. COMBS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Julius A. ROUSSEAU, Jr., Judge; Jerry L. Roten, Clerk of
Court; Ashe County Sheriff's Department; James
C. Hartley, a/k/a Jim Hartley, Sheriff,
Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 95-6020, 95-6021.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 1995.
Decided April 6, 1995.

R.J. Combs, appellant pro se.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. Our review of the records and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Combs v. Freeman, No. CA-94-144-5-V; Combs v. Rousseau, No. CA-94-145-5-V (W.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer