Filed: Aug. 06, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CURTIS L. WRENN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GILBERT F. CASELLAS, Chairman, U.S. Equal Employment No. 95-1164 Opportunity Commission; DONNA E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services; CEO/PRESIDENT UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND HOSPITAL, and its Successor Organization, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1925-JFM
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CURTIS L. WRENN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GILBERT F. CASELLAS, Chairman, U.S. Equal Employment No. 95-1164 Opportunity Commission; DONNA E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services; CEO/PRESIDENT UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND HOSPITAL, and its Successor Organization, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1925-JFM)..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CURTIS L. WRENN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GILBERT F. CASELLAS, Chairman, U.S. Equal Employment No. 95-1164 Opportunity Commission; DONNA E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services; CEO/PRESIDENT UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND HOSPITAL, and its Successor Organization, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-1925-JFM) Submitted: November 30, 1995 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. _________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. _________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Curtis L. Wrenn, Appellant Pro Se. Donna Carol Sanger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Paul D. Ramshaw, UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTU- NITY COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). _________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order finding that his claims were barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel. It appears that a decision in Wrenn v. Shalala. No. 94-5198 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 8, 1995) (unpublished), may have destroyed the finality of a previous order, rendering the bar of res judicata inapplicable. We therefore vacate the decision of the district court. The case is remanded with instructions that the case be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. We grant the motion to file a supplemental pleading. We dispense with oral argument because our review of the record and other materials reveals that it would not aid the decisional process. VACATED AND REMANDED 2