Filed: Jan. 23, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2402 DONOVAN R. MURRAY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-2589) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donovan R. Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, William Sears Estabrook, III, Paula K
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2402 DONOVAN R. MURRAY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-2589) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donovan R. Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, William Sears Estabrook, III, Paula Ke..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-2402 DONOVAN R. MURRAY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-2589) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donovan R. Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, William Sears Estabrook, III, Paula Keyser Speck, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the tax court's order upholding the Commissioner's assessment of deficiencies and penalties with respect to his 1990, 1991, and 1993 federal income tax liabilities. We have reviewed the record and the tax court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Murray v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. No. 2589-95 (U.S. Tax Ct., June 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
