Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mixon v. Commonwealth Atty, 96-1465 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1465 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 03, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1465 JAMES P. MIXON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND PERSONNEL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-699) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1465 JAMES P. MIXON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND PERSONNEL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-699) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James P. Mixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action involving domestic relations issues for lack of juris- diction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mixon v. Commonwealth Attorney's Office, No. CA-95-699 (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 1996). We deny Mixon's pending motions for appointment of counsel, for reconsideration of this court's order deferring consideration of his request for coun- sel, and for a jury trial. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer