Filed: Aug. 06, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6762 STEVEN M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PRISON HEALTH CORPORATION; RONALD MOATS, Warden; DOCTOR MOUBAREK; KENNETH HORNING, As- sistant Warden; DINIA, Physician's Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-87-JFM) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEY
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6762 STEVEN M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PRISON HEALTH CORPORATION; RONALD MOATS, Warden; DOCTOR MOUBAREK; KENNETH HORNING, As- sistant Warden; DINIA, Physician's Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-87-JFM) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYE..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6762 STEVEN M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PRISON HEALTH CORPORATION; RONALD MOATS, Warden; DOCTOR MOUBAREK; KENNETH HORNING, As- sistant Warden; DINIA, Physician's Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-87-JFM) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven M. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Barry Chazen, MEYERS, BILLINGSLEY, SHIPLEY, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, Riverdale, Maryland; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Prison Health Corp., No. CA-96-87-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2