Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Boyd v. Runyon, 98-1615 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-1615 Visitors: 49
Filed: Jul. 08, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1615 WILLIAM L. BOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR., Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-96-725-3) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit J
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1615 WILLIAM L. BOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR., Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-96-725-3) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William L. Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Rae Rixner, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment, denying Appellant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his action filed under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-16 (West 1994 & Supp.1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boyd v. Runyon, No. CA-96- 725-3 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 14, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer