Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Smith v. Brown, 98-6232 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6232 Visitors: 101
Filed: Sep. 01, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6232 MARVIN L. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KELLY BROWN, Probation Officer of Kanawha County, Charleston, West Virginia; JAMES DUNLAP, Probation Officer of Kanawha County, Charleston, West Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-40-2) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: Sep
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6232 MARVIN L. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KELLY BROWN, Probation Officer of Kanawha County, Charleston, West Virginia; JAMES DUNLAP, Probation Officer of Kanawha County, Charleston, West Virginia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-40-2) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 1, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marvin L. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant, a West Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Brown, No. CA-97-40-2 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer