Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Logan v. Brown, 98-6402 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6402 Visitors: 26
Filed: Oct. 19, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6402 ROBERT STEVEN LOGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EARL BROWN, Unit Manager; CHARLES BROCK, Deputy Warden; RICHARD LINDLER, Warden; L. F. BESSINGER, Warden; JOYCE BROWN, Unit Manager; CHARLES MOORE, Inmate Representative; JAMES L. HARVEY, Regional Administrator; WILLIAM D. CATOE, Deputy Commissioner for Operations; PARKER EVATT, Ex-Commissioner; JOHN R. MAXEY, Investigator; GENE NOLES, Assistant Ombudsman; SAMMIE D. BR
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6402 ROBERT STEVEN LOGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EARL BROWN, Unit Manager; CHARLES BROCK, Deputy Warden; RICHARD LINDLER, Warden; L. F. BESSINGER, Warden; JOYCE BROWN, Unit Manager; CHARLES MOORE, Inmate Representative; JAMES L. HARVEY, Regional Administrator; WILLIAM D. CATOE, Deputy Commissioner for Operations; PARKER EVATT, Ex-Commissioner; JOHN R. MAXEY, Investigator; GENE NOLES, Assistant Ombudsman; SAMMIE D. BROWN, Director of Classification; MICHAEL MOORE, Commissioner; E. JENNINGS, Cor- rectional Officer; T. MURRAY, Lieutenant; SAMPSON PARKER, JR., Correctional Officer; TARA HOPKINS, Correctional Officer, TIM RILEY, Chief of Monitoring and Evaluation Branch, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-296-3-20-BC) Submitted: September 15, 1998 Decided: October 19, 1998 Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Steven Logan, Appellant Pro Se. W. Howard Boyd, Jr., GIBBES, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Logan v. Brown, No. CA-97-296-3-20-BC (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer