Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Darlene Stevens, 98-4795 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-4795 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jun. 07, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-4795 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DARLENE STEVENS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Dis- trict Judge. (CR-98-49) Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 7, 1999 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John D. Bryson, WYATT, EARLY, HA
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-4795 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DARLENE STEVENS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Dis- trict Judge. (CR-98-49) Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 7, 1999 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John D. Bryson, WYATT, EARLY, HARRIS & WHEELER, L.L.P., High Point, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Robert A.J. Lang, Assistant United States Attor- ney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Darlene Stevens pled guilty to interstate travel to promote or facilitate the carrying on of unlawful activity, see 18 U.S.C. ยง 1952(a)(3) (1994), and received a sixty month sentence. On ap- peal, she alleges that the district court erred by using the drugs recovered from her apartment for purposes of increasing her base offense level at sentencing, because these drugs were successfully suppressed from evidence. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer