UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1369 WINFRED F. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE COUNTY OF LOUDOUN, VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee, and CARLOS J. SOLORZANO; COUNTY OF LOUDOUN, OFFICE OF THE TREASURER; JOHN DOE, A-Z; JANE DOE, A- Z, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-98-1111-A) Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999 Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Winfred F. Nicholson, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Benedict Williams, HOPKINS & SUTTER, Washington, D.C.; John Richard Roberts, Leesburg, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Winfred F. Nicholson appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his action in which he complained that the County violated his civil rights by seizing a 1993 Lexus and assessing nearly $4,000 in personal property taxes. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nicholson v. County of Loudoun, Virginia, No. CA-98-1111-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2