Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robinson v. Maxey, 99-1608 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-1608 Visitors: 55
Filed: Jul. 28, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1608 THEODORE W. ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HERBERT E. MAXEY, JR.; MICHELLE D. ROBINSON; RICHARD S. BLANTON, in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-98-90-3) Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 28, 1999 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Af
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1608 THEODORE W. ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HERBERT E. MAXEY, JR.; MICHELLE D. ROBINSON; RICHARD S. BLANTON, in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-98-90-3) Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 28, 1999 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theodore W. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Collin Jefferson Hite, Frank B. Miller, III, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia; Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, Gregory E. Lucyk, Edward Meade Macon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Theodore W. Robinson appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Robinson v. Maxey, No. CA-98-90-3 (W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer