Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Williams v. T & S Coal Company, 00-1304 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1304 Visitors: 50
Filed: May 18, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1304 FRANCES E. WILLIAMS, widow of Tommy J. Wil- liams, Sr., Petitioner, versus T & S COAL COMPANY, Employer; WEST VIRGINIA COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS FUND, INCORPO- RATED, Carrier; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPART- MENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-371-BLA, 97-1973-BLA) Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000 Befo
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1304 FRANCES E. WILLIAMS, widow of Tommy J. Wil- liams, Sr., Petitioner, versus T & S COAL COMPANY, Employer; WEST VIRGINIA COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS FUND, INCORPO- RATED, Carrier; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPART- MENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-371-BLA, 97-1973-BLA) Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frances E. Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. Nancy Lovell Tyler, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Vir- ginia; Jeffrey Steven Goldberg, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Frances E. Williams seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and orders affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of survivor’s benefits under the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as amended, see 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999), and denying her motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Williams v. T & S Coal Co., Nos. 99-371-BLA; 97-1973-BLA (BRB Nov. 17, 1999 & Jan. 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer