Filed: Nov. 15, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2113 JOYCE S. KIMBLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee, and MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; MONTGOMERY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 00-234-PJM) Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Cir
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2113 JOYCE S. KIMBLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee, and MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; MONTGOMERY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 00-234-PJM) Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2113
JOYCE S. KIMBLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; MONTGOMERY
COUNTY GOVERNMENT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
00-234-PJM)
Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joyce S. Kimble, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Prestigiacomo Via,
Assistant County Attorney, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Joyce S. Kimble appeals the order of the district court grant-
ing motions to dismiss her complaint as to Defendants Montgomery
County Public Schools and the Montgomery County Government, and
deferring action on a motion to dismiss the Montgomery County Board
of Education to allow Kimble to amend her complaint. We dismiss
the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not ap-
pealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541 (1949). The
order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2