Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. McGeorge, 00-6514 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-6514 Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 23, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6514 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JACKIE MCGEORGE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-97-109, CA-99-1578-AM) Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 23, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jackie McGe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6514 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JACKIE MCGEORGE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-97-109, CA-99-1578-AM) Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 23, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jackie McGeorge, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jackie McGeorge seeks to appeal the district court’s order de- nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See United States v. McGeorge, Nos. CR-97-109; CA-99- 1578-AM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 28, 2000; entered Mar. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer