Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bodie v. Angelone, 00-7117 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7117 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 15, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7117 LARRY BODIE, Plaintiff- Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE; DR. CEI; K. B. HUBBARD; J. S. KEELING; A. M. POWERS; R. R. ROBINSON; P. K. MELVIN; J. S. GARMAN; J. L. FRANKLIN; J. E. WHITE; K. L. OSBORNE; H. S. RICHESON; C. F. SPARKS; P. A. TERRANGI; R. FLEMMING; L. A. CORNERS; MS. PORCHER; J. PETTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7117 LARRY BODIE, Plaintiff- Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE; DR. CEI; K. B. HUBBARD; J. S. KEELING; A. M. POWERS; R. R. ROBINSON; P. K. MELVIN; J. S. GARMAN; J. L. FRANKLIN; J. E. WHITE; K. L. OSBORNE; H. S. RICHESON; C. F. SPARKS; P. A. TERRANGI; R. FLEMMING; L. A. CORNERS; MS. PORCHER; J. PETTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-810-3) Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Bodie, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Larry Bodie, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a) (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Bodie v. Angelone, No. CA-99-810-3 (E.D. Va. July 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer