Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Willard v. Arnette, 97-7214 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7214 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 02, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Filed: February 2, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7214 (CA-96-1827-6-13AK) Jackie Willard, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus Correctional Officer J. Arnette, et al, Defendants - Appellees. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed February 18, 1998, as follows: On the cover sheet and in the text of the opinion - the spelling of appellant’s name is corrected to read “Jackie Willard.” For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED S
More
Filed: February 2, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7214 (CA-96-1827-6-13AK) Jackie Willard, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus Correctional Officer J. Arnette, et al, Defendants - Appellees. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed February 18, 1998, as follows: On the cover sheet and in the text of the opinion -- the spelling of appellant’s name is corrected to read “Jackie Willard.” For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7214 JACKIE WILLARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. ARNETTE; LIEUTENANT H. HENDERSON; SERGEANT MADDOX; CAPTAIN FAULKEN- BERRY; EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1827-6-13AK) Submitted: February 3, 1998 Decided: February 18, 1998 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jackie Willard, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. Willard v. Arnette, No. CA-96-1827-6-13AK (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer