UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7297 RODNEY EUGENE THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; JOSEPH G. BURDZY, Deputy Sheriff; DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; WINSTON-SALEM CITY POLICE DEPART- MENT; D. G. PROCTOR, Deputy Sheriff; FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-98-253-1) Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 2, 2000 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney Eugene Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Susan D. Moore, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina; Christine Marion Ryan, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Gusti Wiesenfeld Frankel, Allan R. Gitter, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Rodney Eugene Thompson appeals the district court’s order de- nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers- ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. See Thompson v. Guilford County Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-98-253-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1999). Thompson’s motion to have this court review the original record is granted. We deny Thomp- son’s motion for the appointment of counsel and deny the motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2