Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wilson v. Mon Cnty Jail Nurse, 00-7712 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-7712 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 14, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7712 ROBERT LOUIS WILSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MONONGALIA COUNTY JAIL NURSE; MONONGALIA COUNTY JAIL; TONY BARILL, Sheriff; TAMMY BELLDINA, Jail Administrator; DOUG CHURCH, Correctional Officer; CARL MORTON, Correction- al Officer; PEGGY GALE, Correctional Officer; MIKE FORBES, Correctional Officer; DANA STOCKETT, Correctional Officer; MISSY LOWE, Correctional Officer; JASON DUESENBERRY, Cor- rectional Officer; DEE
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7712 ROBERT LOUIS WILSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MONONGALIA COUNTY JAIL NURSE; MONONGALIA COUNTY JAIL; TONY BARILL, Sheriff; TAMMY BELLDINA, Jail Administrator; DOUG CHURCH, Correctional Officer; CARL MORTON, Correction- al Officer; PEGGY GALE, Correctional Officer; MIKE FORBES, Correctional Officer; DANA STOCKETT, Correctional Officer; MISSY LOWE, Correctional Officer; JASON DUESENBERRY, Cor- rectional Officer; DEE HENDERSON, Correctional Officer; LARRY STUMP, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-153-1) Submitted: June 26, 2001 Decided: August 14, 2001 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Louis Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Robert Louis Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilson v. Monongalia Cnty Jail Nurse, No. CA-00-153-1 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer