Filed: Apr. 18, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1013 JERRY DALE CARTWRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer, An Ohio Corporation; ROBERT J. SMITH, Commission- er of the Bureau of Employment Programs of the State of West Virginia, Workers' Compensation Division, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-00-396
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1013 JERRY DALE CARTWRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer, An Ohio Corporation; ROBERT J. SMITH, Commission- er of the Bureau of Employment Programs of the State of West Virginia, Workers' Compensation Division, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-00-396)..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1013 JERRY DALE CARTWRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer, An Ohio Corporation; ROBERT J. SMITH, Commission- er of the Bureau of Employment Programs of the State of West Virginia, Workers' Compensation Division, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-00-396) Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 18, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Dale Cartwright, Appellant Pro Se. Scott W. Andrews, OFFUTT, FISHER & NORD, Huntington, West Virginia; Frederick George Staker, III, EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS LITIGATION UNIT, Charleston, West Vir- ginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jerry Dale Cartwright appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his complaint filed pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cartwright v. Smith, No. CA-00-396 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2