Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Harley v. Lambert, 01-1346 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-1346 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 08, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1346 ISAIAH HARLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VICTORIA A. LAMBERT; LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 99-2862-CCB) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Isaiah Harle
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1346 ISAIAH HARLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VICTORIA A. LAMBERT; LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 99-2862-CCB) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Isaiah Harley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Isaiah Harley seeks to appeal an order of the district court purportedly entered on March 2, 2001. The district court docket sheet reflects that there was no order entered by the court on or around that date. To the extent Harley seeks to appeal the dis- trict court’s order filed on September 28, 1999, and entered on the district court’s docket on September 29, 1999, dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous, Harley already has appealed that order, and we affirmed the district court’s dismissal. Harley v. Lambert, No. 99-2403 (4th Cir. Dec. 21, 1999) (unpublished). We therefore dis- miss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer