Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Parker v. Danzig, Sec, 01-1737 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-1737 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 12, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1737 DONNA PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD DANZIG, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-00-412-2) Submitted: November 28, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. J. Gray Lawrence,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1737 DONNA PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD DANZIG, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-00-412-2) Submitted: November 28, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. J. Gray Lawrence, Jr., FAGGERT & FRIEDEN, P.C., Chesapeake, Vir- ginia, for Appellant. Kenneth E. Melson, United States Attorney, Anita K. Henry, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Vir- ginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Donna Lee Parker appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant on her claim of sexual discrimination filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) (1994). We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parker v. Danzig, No. CA-00-412-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer