Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mackey v. Weldon, 01-6478 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-6478 Visitors: 32
Filed: Aug. 02, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6478 JAMES MACKEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIE WELDON, Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution; CHARLES CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-360-6) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TR
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6478 JAMES MACKEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIE WELDON, Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution; CHARLES CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-360-6) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Mackey, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Robert Eugene Bogan, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James Mackey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Mackey v. Weldon, No. CA-99-360-6 (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer