Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Griggs v. Waters, 01-8012 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 01-8012 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 27, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8012 THOMAS WAYNE GRIGGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LLOYD L. WATERS; COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND; COMMISSIONER SONDERVAN; CAPTAIN STOTTLEMYER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-27-AW) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002 Before WIDEN
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8012 THOMAS WAYNE GRIGGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LLOYD L. WATERS; COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND; COMMISSIONER SONDERVAN; CAPTAIN STOTTLEMYER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-27-AW) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Wayne Griggs, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Thomas Wayne Griggs appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Griggs v. Waters, No. CA-01-27-AW (D. Md. Nov. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer