Filed: Mar. 06, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8042 RAYMOND OFFUTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM FILBERT, Warden; WILLIAM W. SONDER- VANE, Commissioner of Maryland Division of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-01- 3253-AMD) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 6, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed b
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8042 RAYMOND OFFUTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM FILBERT, Warden; WILLIAM W. SONDER- VANE, Commissioner of Maryland Division of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-01- 3253-AMD) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 6, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8042 RAYMOND OFFUTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM FILBERT, Warden; WILLIAM W. SONDER- VANE, Commissioner of Maryland Division of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-01- 3253-AMD) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 6, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Offutt, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Raymond Offutt appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous or malicious his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Offutt v. Filbert, No. CA-01-3253-AMD (D. Md. filed Nov. 21, 2001; entered Nov. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
