Filed: Sep. 04, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1711 ROBERT JOHN SCHIEBLE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MELISSA MCKEE; BROCH, Senior Code Enforcement Officer; CHRISTINE BERG, Code Enforcement Officer; RANDY GREEN, Code Enforcement Officer; BURNS, Deputy; JOHN DOES, being all other officers and code enforcement officers on site on 5 and 6 April 1999, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charlesto
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1711 ROBERT JOHN SCHIEBLE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MELISSA MCKEE; BROCH, Senior Code Enforcement Officer; CHRISTINE BERG, Code Enforcement Officer; RANDY GREEN, Code Enforcement Officer; BURNS, Deputy; JOHN DOES, being all other officers and code enforcement officers on site on 5 and 6 April 1999, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1711
ROBERT JOHN SCHIEBLE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MELISSA MCKEE; BROCH, Senior Code Enforcement
Officer; CHRISTINE BERG, Code Enforcement
Officer; RANDY GREEN, Code Enforcement
Officer; BURNS, Deputy; JOHN DOES, being all
other officers and code enforcement officers
on site on 5 and 6 April 1999,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-02-1122-2-18)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 4, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert John Schieble, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Robert John Schieble, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Schieble v. McKee, No. CA-02-
1122-2-18 (D.S.C. filed May 20, 2002 & entered May 22, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2