Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Daye v. Barnes, 02-6941 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-6941 Visitors: 27
Filed: Sep. 11, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6941 PHILLIP ANTHONY DAYE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. J. BARNES, Sheriff; WILLARDEAN DULA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-01-94-1) Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phillip A
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6941 PHILLIP ANTHONY DAYE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. J. BARNES, Sheriff; WILLARDEAN DULA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-01-94-1) Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002 Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phillip Anthony Daye, Appellant Pro Se. Susan D. Moore, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina; Perry Cleveland Henson, Sr., Amanda Mary Willis, HENSON & HENSON, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Phillip Anthony Daye appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Daye v. Barnes, No. CA-01-94-1 (M.D.N.C. May 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer