Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Merriweather v. Eagleton, 02-6957 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-6957 Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 09, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6957 WILLIE S. MERRIWEATHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIE L. EAGLETON, Warden, Evans Correctional Institution; ROBIN CHAVIS, Associate Warden; ARRON JOINER, Major; Polly PRATT, Caseworker; FNU NICK, SERGEANT; FNU CHAMPAIGNE, Sergeant; JAMES GRIFFIN, Investigator; OFFICER FRIDAY; KENNY GREEN, Captain; WILLIAM D. CATOE, Commissioner of SCDC; OFFICER QUICK, Lieutenant of DHO-SMU lockup; LIEUTENANT G. VICTOR; D. J. EVAN
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6957 WILLIE S. MERRIWEATHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIE L. EAGLETON, Warden, Evans Correctional Institution; ROBIN CHAVIS, Associate Warden; ARRON JOINER, Major; Polly PRATT, Caseworker; FNU NICK, SERGEANT; FNU CHAMPAIGNE, Sergeant; JAMES GRIFFIN, Investigator; OFFICER FRIDAY; KENNY GREEN, Captain; WILLIAM D. CATOE, Commissioner of SCDC; OFFICER QUICK, Lieutenant of DHO-SMU lockup; LIEUTENANT G. VICTOR; D. J. EVANS, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-01-5-9-25) Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 9, 2002 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie S. Merriweather, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Macon Flynn, SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Willie S. Merriweather appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Merriweather v. Eagleton, No. CA-01-5-9-25 (D.S.C. May 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer