Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bishop v. Equivest, 02-2099 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 02-2099 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 13, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2099 JERRY L. BISHOP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PEPPERTREE RESORTS, LTD., a/k/a Equivest Resorts Incorporated, a/k/a Equivest Finance, a/k/a Equivest Financial, Incorporated, a/k/a Equivest, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-01-87-1-T) Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003 Befo
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2099 JERRY L. BISHOP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PEPPERTREE RESORTS, LTD., a/k/a Equivest Resorts Incorporated, a/k/a Equivest Finance, a/k/a Equivest Financial, Incorporated, a/k/a Equivest, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-01-87-1-T) Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry L. Bishop, Appellant Pro Se. Earl Thomison Holman, ADAMS, HENDON, CARSON, CROW & SAENGER, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jerry L. Bishop appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his age discrimination and retaliation suit and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bishop v. Peppertree Resorts, Ltd., No. CA-01-87-1-T (W.D.N.C. July 25, 2002; Aug. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer